I know how this man feels after having dealt with douche bag cops like G.Rodriguez Fowler PD complaint filed and sustained!!!
Monday, September 21, 2009
"The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife,"
insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain
why the typical tax-feeder isn't the sharpest blade in the cutlery
drawer.
One suitable example is the specimen who ruined what was an
otherwise pleasant drive to northern Idaho last Friday night
(September 18) -- a fellow whose finely honed sense of unearned
privilege coexisted with an intellect whose acuity was roughly the
same as that of a rusty butter knife.
I was part of a small group traveling to the tiny but beautiful
village of Potlatch, where I was to give the keynote address at the
Liberty Roundup, a forum featuring candidates for state and
congressional offices.
My friend Scott Watson was behind the wheel, my wife Korrin and
our seven-month-old son in the backseat. We had just passed
through Lapwai when we caught the dreaded sight of running
lights in our rear-view mirror.
Scott pulled to the side of the road onto a shoulder that proved
too narrow to accommodate the donut-burner as he went
through the familiar shakedown ritual. Thus instead of
approaching the driver-side window, the officer -- a Nez Perce
County Deputy Sheriff -- tapped insistently on the window next
to me.
Yeah, I'll bet that this is going to go really well, I thought grimly
to myself as I rolled down the window.
"What's your hurry?" began the deputy, reciting directly from the
big book of police cliches in a voice heavy with affected
heartiness.
"I'm not in a hurry," Scott said in a composed but slightly annoyed
voice, reflecting his commendable dislike of being patronized.
"Well, I have you going 72 in a 55," the deputy continued in the
same contrived tone. (This was untrue; we were in a 65 MPH
zone, as the GPS on Scott's dashboard demonstrated.) He then
asked where we were headed, then paused while Scott busied
himself procuring the required documents. The deputy then cast
a glance around the interior.
"Oh, and I'll need to see ID for the passengers as well," he said
casually.
Here we go, I thought.
"Why is that necessary?" I inquired in a level, formal tone.
"Because I told you so," the deputy said with a slight edge to his
voice, as if that settled the matter.
It didn't.
"I'm going to need a better reason than that," I explained in the
same tone I had previously used.
During the pause that followed, I saw the deputy's lips compress
in frustration and color begin to flood the part of his face that was
visible.
"The Idaho State Code requires that citizens present identification
when ordered to by a law enforcement officer!" he hissed. "If you'd
like, I'll bring the Code book and show you!"
"Yes, that would be nice," I said blithely, handing him Korrin's
driver's license and my official state ID card (but not my license).
The deputy (who made a point of keeping his badge, and thus his
own identification, out of view) collected the paperwork.
"You just helped your friend get a ticket," he grunted in my
direction as he turned toward his
vehicle.
A few minutes later the deputy's voice was heard behind Scott's
car:
"Mr. Watson, would you step out of your vehicle? I want to speak
with you for a minute."
Scott -- an exceptionally level-headed fellow -- shook his head
and let out an exasperated sigh as he exited the car.
"What is he doing with Scott?" Korrin asked me.
"He's back there playing some kind of alpha-male game," I
replied, predicting that he'd find some way to do Scott a "favor" in
expectation of Scott's submissive gratitude.
To Scott's considerable credit, he remained utterly stolid in the
face of the armed stranger's posturing. When he came back to the
car, he was even more disgusted than he had been when he left -
- even though he brought the welcome news that he was not
getting a ticket. As he handed our ID cards back to Korrin and
me, Scott related the conversation to us.
"The first thing he asked me was, `How do you know William
Grigg?'" Scott reported. "I told him, `Will is a friend of mine.' Then
he said, `Well, you tell him that next time he encounters law
enforcement, he'd better cool it!' Then he said that I wasn't going
to get a ticket because I had been `cooperative,' but warned that
there were two state troopers between here and Lewiston and that
they'd stop me if I went as much as three miles over the speed
limit, so I'd better be careful."
Of course, the deputy lied when he promised to show me the
section of the Idaho State Code supposedly requiring passengers
to produce identification, as I expected him to.
I didn't press the matter as forcefully as I could have because,
after all, I wasn't the driver; I was willing to push back hard
enough to make a point, but didn't want to cause further trouble
for Scott.
The deputy also lied when he said that his demand was backed by
statutory authority. There is no section of the Idaho State Code
that authorizes law enforcement to demand identification from a
passenger in a vehicle, or the typical citizen on the street.
"A peace officer can require a person to display ID in a bar, or
from someone who is driving a motor vehicle," explained Sgt.
Clarence Costner of the Payette County Sheriff's Office in reply to
my inquiry. "Officers can also check ID when there is probable
cause of some kind that leads to an investigation of a crime -- for
instance, there's been a burglary in a neighborhood, and
someone might fit a suspect description. And of course, they can
check ID on a consensual basis, the same way they can carry out
a search."
However, Sgt. Costner emphasized, "there is no physical law that
says people have to display ID on demand unless they're driving a
vehicle."
"What about a passenger riding in an automobile?" I specified.
"No -- you don't have to display ID as a passenger; only as a
driver," repeated Sgt. Costner.
Locke defines tyranny as power exercised beyond right. The
deputy who demanded my ID was acting as a petty tyrant. Had he
threatened me with arrest for refusing to produce it, he would
have committed a crime specifically defined in the Idaho State
Code: Title 18, section 703
provides that "Every public officer ... who, under the pretense or
color of any process or other legal authority, arrests any person
or detains him against his will ... without a regular process or
other lawful authority therefor, is guilty of a misdemeanor."
The presumptuous intrusiveness of the deputy who stopped us
reflects a martial law mindset: Like most law enforcement
officers, he sees himself as a caste apart from, and set above, the
"civilian" population, and thus empowered to command
submission from us.
More to the point: He sees himself as possessing innate authority,
rather than authority derived from the law. He is the law, at least
in the theater of his small and otherwise uncluttered mind. Note
how his idea of a legal warrant is the phrase, "Because I told you
to."
My polite but pointed rejoinder was based on the tacit but clearly
understood question, quo warranto? -- By what authority are you
making this demand? This dispelled the deputy's pretense that he
is somebody to whom reflexive obedience is due, as opposed to
someone whose authority -- such as it is -- must be considered
derivative, limited, and conditional.
Sure, the deputy succeeded in securing cooperation through a lie.
But the frustration-inspired threat of collective punishment --
"You just helped your friend get a ticket!" -- and the impotent
warning, delivered from a safe distance by way of my friend Scott
("tell your friend he'd better cool it!") give some indication, I
suspect, of how deeply this encounter injured the officer's
unearned sense of self-regard. Most acts of lawless police
violence are committed in the service of that self-image, which is
endlessly reinforced through training and peer socialization.
In 1992, amid a growing scandal provoked by a wave of criminal
violence committed by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's
Department, an investigation was conducted under the leadership
of James G. Kolts, a conservative Republican retired L.A. County
Superior Court Judge who had been appointed by Ronald Reagan.
The resulting 358-page "Kolts Report" described a department
that behaved in a manner largely indistinguishable from the
conduct of a Third World death squad: Beatings, extra-judicial
killings, planting evidence, robberies, and other undisguised
criminal actions were commonplace; they almost always went
unpunished, and were often rewarded.
One particularly notorious deputy, Paul Archambault, was a serial
killer with a badge; in two different instances he gunned down
unarmed and harmless people, the first time actually stopping to
reload before commenting, "he's still moving" and unleashing a
second volley.
On one occasion, as sheriff's deputies pumped round after round
into a man named Hyong Po Lee following a pursuit, one San Jose
police officer who witnessed the event commented to another:
"We just observed the sheriffs execute someone." In the year prior
to the formation of the Kolts Commission, there were several
instances in which deputies back-shot unarmed people; none of
the shooters was ever disciplined in any way, let alone
prosecuted.
Summary execution was not the only distinguishing activity of the
LASO's under Sheriff Sherman Block. In April 1989, a man named
Demetrio Carillo was seized and beaten after he rebuked deputies
for driving on the sidewalk near his home -- one of many to face
summary "street justice" for "mouthing off." Deputies were taught
by Field Training Officers how to falsify official reports to justify
an arrest after the fact when the real purpose of the arrest was to
punish anyone who refused to display the required deference.
"This is the worst aspect of police culture, where the worst crime
of all is `contempt of cop,'" observed the Kolts Report. "The
deputy cannot let pass the slightest challenge or failure
immediately to comply. It is here that excessive force starts and
needs to be stopped."
The endless parade of abuses inflicted by police on citizens who
fail to display the required docility testifies that this " aspect of
police culture" has replicated itself nation-wide. In the company
of my wife, our infant child, and a close friend, I encountered it
just north of Lapwai, Idaho last Friday night. Things could have
turned out much worse. Next time, they probably will.
Posted 19:03
|
School Resource Officers what a joke!!! We have seen video of what they do at RHS.
What Did The Police Teach Your Child Today?
http://www.injusticeeverywhere.com/?p=1065
What Did The Police Teach Your Child Today?
By Packratt, on October 7th, 2009
One of the more notorious stories this week
comes from Dolton Illinois
http://cbs2chicago.com/investigatio....2.1232197.
html
where a 15-year-old student who suffers from a
learning disability caused by a brain injury was
apparently assaulted at a special needs school
by a Dolton police department “school resource
officer”. That officer apparently took issue
with the child’s untucked shirt and this issue
escalated into a one-sided attack in which a
controversial take-down method called “a face-
down take-down” was used which resulted in a
broken nose and facial lacerations for the
student. That move has been banned in at least 8
states since it’s responsible for at least 20
deaths.
It was only in recent times when local
governments decided that placing police officers
in schools, and calling them “School Resource
Officers” was a good idea, all in the name of
student safety. Of course, it’s hard to argue
against the idea given a few high profile school
shootings such as what happened in Columbine
Colorado.
However, cases like what is alleged to have
happened in Dolton Illinois should cause parents
some pause about whether loading their schools
up with these “resource officers” is such a good
idea as it’s currently implemented. After all,
to argue that their presence enhances safety it
also has to be true that their presence doesn’t
also put children at undue risk too.
More than this, even, law enforcement agencies
must be mindful that, in these days of public
relations pushes focused on establishing trust
in the police, that the lessons learned by
people in their youth make far more impact than
a PR push targeting them when they are adults…
Indeed, the lessons learned by children in
school last a lifetime, so one wonders what
school resource officers are teaching our
children in our schools…
For example, in just the last couple months:
In Tolleson Arizona, they teach kids about gun
safety at a very young age after an armed
elementary school resource officer accidentally
shot one of his fingers off while kids were
being released from school.
http://www.azcentral.com/community/...ing0422-
ON.html
In Dougherty County Georgia, 11-year-old girls
have learned that refusing to have your picture
taken will get you choked and arrested.
http://www.walb.com/Global/story.asp?S=11003785
In Ladysmith Wisconsin, 16-year-old girls have
learned that sexting cops is cool. Why? Because
down the road in Milton Wisconsin students there
already learned that police officers don’t get
in trouble for sexting and molesting high school
students.
http://www.weau.com/news/headlines/42718362.html
http://gazettextra.com/weblogs/late...former-
officer/
In Penn Hills Pennsylvania, however, students
there learned that police only like it when the
girls use cell phones in the halls because when
you’re a boy you get electrocuted and charged
with a felony for it.
http://blog.simplejustice.us/2009/0...er-
edition.aspx
In Toledo Ohio, a 16-year-old girl learned an
ugly lesson about sexual assault from a cop who
was assigned as a school resource officer
despite a history of groping women at traffic
stops. They also seem to be letting school
resource officers teach sexual education in
Vicksburg Mississippi and Pinellas Florida too.
http://www.wtol.com/global/story.asp?s=11186069
http://www.vicksburgpost.com/articl...b4021814665
.txt
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2009/ap.../news-
breaking/
And just today in West Valley Utah, a school
resource officer was arrested after sending what
he thought was a 15-year-old boy pornography via
email and arranging a meeting with the presumed
teen for sex, fortunately for the students he
guarded, the boy was actually an undercover
officer.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/...minor-
case.html
Obviously, I doubt that anyone will be able to
convince people to rethink the idea about
putting armed police officers who are trained to
think of their own safety before anything else
in our schools to “protect” our children. But, I
think it would be a reasonable thing to ask that
law enforcement agencies consider being more
careful about choosing officers with the right
temperament for working with children and
carefully retraining them to be less aggressive
when placing them in our schools.
After all, if what happened in Dolton Illinois
teaches us anything, it’s that putting a police
officer with aggression issues, who is three
times the size of the kids around him, in our
schools can be as dangerous a proposition as not
putting any officers in our schools at all… lest
they really want to get a head-start on teaching
the next generation that it might be best not to
trust the police at all.
__________________
I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If
I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I
find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free
because I know that I alone am morally
responsible for everything I do.
~Robert A. Heinlein
|